Free tool · No signup
Paste any URL and get an AI-search readiness score out of 100 — 14 checks across structured data, semantic HTML, content extractability, and AI-crawler access, with a plain-English verdict and the three fixes that matter most.
An AI SEO audit checks how ready a page is to be read and cited by AI search engines. It inspects structured data, semantic HTML, meta tags, crawler access, and content extractability — the signals assistants like ChatGPT and Perplexity rely on to surface and quote a page in answers.
Free · 10 AI runs per day · No signup required
What Meev is
Meev tracks where your brand appears across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, Grok, DeepSeek, Google AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode, then shows what to fix, publish, or pitch next to improve AI visibility.
The path to getting cited
01 · Your domain
Meev reads your existing pages, topics, and Google Search Console signals to learn what your site is about and already ranks for: the foundation for every gap, draft, and citation that follows.
Step 1
Paste a URL
Any public page — your homepage, a blog post, a product page.
Step 2
We run 14 checks
Metadata, headings, schema, image alts, content depth, llms.txt, and AI-crawler access in robots.txt.
Step 3
Get your score
Every check passes, warns, or fails, and rolls up into a 0–100 readiness score.
Step 4
Fix what matters
A written verdict ranks the three highest-impact fixes so you know exactly where to start.
Classic SEO asks whether Google can rank your page. AI search asks whether an engine can fetch your page, parse it without running JavaScript, and extract a quotable answer. Those are different tests — a page can rank well in classic search and still be invisible to ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews because the content lives behind client-side rendering or unstructured markup.
AI engines don't list ten blue links — they synthesize one answer and cite the pages they could extract from. Pages that earn citations share a profile: one clear H1, real section structure, FAQ or HowTo schema, healthy text-to-markup ratio, and self-contained passages an engine can lift verbatim. The audit measures exactly that profile, check by check.
Many sites block GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot in robots.txt — sometimes deliberately, often from a copy-pasted template nobody reviewed. A blocked crawler means that surface can never read your content, so it can never cite you, no matter how good the page is. The audit reads your robots.txt and tells you which AI crawlers are locked out.
With Meev
Running one audit shows you the gaps on one page. Every article Meev writes and publishes ships with the structure this audit checks for already built in — and visibility tracking shows whether AI engines actually cite it.
It runs 14 checks across four areas: metadata (title, description, canonical, Open Graph), semantic structure (H1, section headings, image alt text), content extractability (word count, text-to-HTML ratio, structured data, FAQ/HowTo schema), and AI access (robots noindex, llms.txt, and whether robots.txt blocks GPTBot, ClaudeBot, or PerplexityBot). Each check passes, warns, or fails, and the results roll up into a 0–100 score.
80 and above means the page is in strong shape — engines can fetch, parse, and extract from it. 50–79 means real but fixable gaps; the top-fixes list tells you where to start. Below 50 usually signals a structural problem, most often content that isn't visible without JavaScript or missing metadata across the board.
There's overlap — titles, descriptions, and headings matter to both. The AI-specific layer is what most classic audits skip: whether your text is readable without executing JavaScript, whether FAQ/HowTo schema gives engines Q&A structure to extract, whether an llms.txt file exists, and whether AI crawlers are blocked in robots.txt. A page can pass a classic audit and fail every one of those.
Many AI crawlers fetch your raw HTML and don't execute JavaScript. If your visible text is a tiny fraction of the markup — common with heavily client-rendered pages — those crawlers see a nearly empty page. A healthy ratio means the content actually ships in the HTML, which is the single most important precondition for being cited.
No — Google ranking and GPTBot access are independent. But blocking GPTBot removes your content from ChatGPT's retrieval, so you can't be cited there; the same logic applies to ClaudeBot and PerplexityBot for their surfaces. Some publishers block deliberately as a licensing stance — the audit's job is making sure it's a decision, not an accident.
After any meaningful change to the page — a redesign, a new rendering setup, a schema change — and monthly as a baseline for important pages. Audit results for a given URL are cached for 24 hours, so re-checking the same page within a day returns the same report without using a run.
Meev tracks your visibility across every major AI search surface and publishes quality-gated content that earns citations — automatically.
7-day free trial. Cancel anytime.
AI Search
AI Overview Tracker
See which queries trigger Google AI Overviews, and whether you're cited
AI Search
Topical Map Generator
Map any site's content into topic clusters from its sitemap
AI Search
AI Crawler Simulator
See what GPTBot, ClaudeBot, and Googlebot see on your page
AI Search
Query Fan-Out Generator
Turn one query into 25+ AI-search variations, grouped by intent
AI Search
Page Token Inspector
See your page the way an AI engine reads it — token by token
AI Search
LLMs.txt Generator
Generate an llms.txt file so AI engines index your site correctly